HotPDF は Delphi/C++Builder アプリケーション向けのネイティブ VCL PDF ライブラリです。外部 PDF ランタイムを配置せずに、PDF 作成、編集、フォーム、注釈、暗号化、デジタル署名、Unicode フォント、標準対応出力、プリフライトレポートを扱えます。
この記事は teams that need repeatable PDF intake, release gates, or customer-support diagnostics 向けです。automated PDF preflight reports を単なるコンポーネント呼び出しではなく、本番向けのドキュメントエンジニアリングとして扱います。
実務上のリスクは manual visual checks are inconsistent and do not create machine-readable evidence for operators, CI jobs, or support engineers です。そのため、明確な契約、観測可能な診断、実際の顧客ファイルに近い回帰サンプルが必要です。
アーキテクチャ上の判断
Turn preflight into a policy service. profiles for intake, release, archive, print, and accessibility checks / severity thresholds, waiver rules, and customer-specific exceptions
- profiles for intake, release, archive, print, and accessibility checks
- severity thresholds, waiver rules, and customer-specific exceptions
- report formats for humans, CI logs, dashboards, and support bundles
- time limits, maximum file size, and quarantine behavior for damaged input
実装フロー
Classify findings before deciding pass or fail. The order below keeps the workflow reviewable for Delphi and C++Builder teams.
- identify the business purpose before selecting the preflight profile
- run validation in an isolated step before editing or distributing the document
- normalize findings into stable codes, severities, locations, and remediation hints
- apply waiver policy after findings are classified, not before validation
- store the report beside the output or ticket that depends on it
検証エビデンス
Report fields that make findings actionable. Keep these fields with the output or support record.
- profile version, input hash, validator version, elapsed time, and pass or fail result
- finding code, severity, page, object reference, and operator-facing message
- waiver identifier, reviewer, expiry, and affected issue codes
- machine-readable summary for CI plus an HTML or text report for support
A report is only useful when it drives a decision
Preflight automation should map low-level PDF findings to product decisions. Operators need to know what failed, why it matters, whether retry is useful, and where the affected page or object can be inspected.
Decision table for automated PDF preflight reports
A decision table keeps product ownership visible when the same workflow is reused by a desktop tool, service job, and support utility.
| Decision | Engineering reason | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| profiles for intake, release, archive, print, and accessibility checks | identify the business purpose before selecting the preflight profile | profile version, input hash, validator version, elapsed time, and pass or fail result |
| severity thresholds, waiver rules, and customer-specific exceptions | run validation in an isolated step before editing or distributing the document | finding code, severity, page, object reference, and operator-facing message |
| report formats for humans, CI logs, dashboards, and support bundles | normalize findings into stable codes, severities, locations, and remediation hints | waiver identifier, reviewer, expiry, and affected issue codes |
automated PDF preflight reports に関する技術レビューの注意点
これらのレビュー項目を使って、機能がデモ段階を超え、リリース、サポート、顧客エスカレーションの場で説明できることを確認します
- 判断: profiles for intake, release, archive, print, and accessibility checks. 実装上の焦点: run validation in an isolated step before editing or distributing the document. 受け入れ証拠: waiver identifier, reviewer, expiry, and affected issue codes. 回帰の引き金: support staff need stable issue codes rather than parser exception text
- 判断: severity thresholds, waiver rules, and customer-specific exceptions. 実装上の焦点: normalize findings into stable codes, severities, locations, and remediation hints. 受け入れ証拠: machine-readable summary for CI plus an HTML or text report for support. 回帰の引き金: warnings can become release blockers when the target channel changes
- 判断: report formats for humans, CI logs, dashboards, and support bundles. 実装上の焦点: apply waiver policy after findings are classified, not before validation. 受け入れ証拠: profile version, input hash, validator version, elapsed time, and pass or fail result. 回帰の引き金: batch preflight should limit memory and CPU per file to protect queues
境界ケース
- warnings can become release blockers when the target channel changes
- batch preflight should limit memory and CPU per file to protect queues
- repairing input before preflight can hide the original customer issue
- support staff need stable issue codes rather than parser exception text
Delphi / C++Builder の補足
HotPDF Component should sit behind a small service boundary that receives files, streams, profiles, and credentials, then returns output paths, warnings, metrics, and validation status. 重要な用語には preflight, validation profile, report automation, severity, waiver, CI gate.
Delphi コード例
次の Delphi スケッチは、このテーマに対する実用的なサービス境界を示します。ポリシー確認、ログ記録、検証を製品呼び出しの狭い部分の外側に置くと、ワークフローをテストしやすくなります。
procedure RunPreflightBatch(const InputFile, ReportFile: string);
var
Pdf: THotPDF;
Profile: THPDFPreflightProfile;
Report: string;
begin
Pdf := THotPDF.Create(nil);
try
Profile := Pdf.GetBuiltInPreflightProfile('strict');
Report := Pdf.CreatePreflightReportWithProfile(InputFile, Profile);
TFile.WriteAllText(ReportFile, Report, TEncoding.UTF8);
RaiseIfBlockingFindings(Report);
finally
Pdf.Free;
end;
end;
本番チェックリスト
- ワークフローは、空のファイル、通常の顧客ファイル、最悪ケースのファイルで実行します
- 生成された PDF は、対象のビューアー、検証ツール、プリンター、または downstream アプリケーションで開きます
- 製品バージョン、プロファイルバージョン、入力ハッシュ、出力パス、経過時間、警告数を記録します
- パスワード、証明書、一時ファイル、顧客データは明確な保持ルールの下で管理します
- 顧客ファイルが新しい境界ケースを示したら、回帰用ドキュメントを追加します
製品ドキュメント
追加のコード例
function TriagePdf(Pdf: THotPDF; const FileName: string): Boolean;
var
Handle, Pages: Integer;
begin
Result := False;
Handle := Pdf.DAOpenFileReadOnly(FileName, '');
if Handle <= 0 then
Exit; // structurally unreadable: quarantine, do not validate
try
Pages := Pdf.DAGetPageCount(Handle);
Result := Pages > 0;
finally
Pdf.DACloseFile(Handle);
end;
end;function RunVeraPdf(const PdfFile, ReportFile: string): Cardinal;
var
Cmd: string;
SI: TStartupInfo;
PI: TProcessInformation;
begin
Cmd := Format('cmd /c verapdf.bat --format xml "%s" > "%s"',
[PdfFile, ReportFile]);
FillChar(SI, SizeOf(SI), 0);
SI.cb := SizeOf(SI);
if not CreateProcess(nil, PChar(Cmd), nil, nil, False,
CREATE_NO_WINDOW, nil, nil, SI, PI) then
RaiseLastOSError;
try
WaitForSingleObject(PI.hProcess, 120000); // bound the wait per file
GetExitCodeProcess(PI.hProcess, Result);
finally
CloseHandle(PI.hThread);
CloseHandle(PI.hProcess);
end;
end;